Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Why Mary?

In the Hobbit, Bilbo was chosen because it seemed he didn't want an adventure, that he was afraid of them, and he tried avoiding them as well as he could. Gandalf said that very well might mean he did want one.

In church, I've heard sermons of how wonderful and "worthy" Mary must have been, being maybe only thirteen or fifteen years old, to be chosen to be Jesus' mother. But she was just as human as everyone else.
She must have feared God. She may have been quiet and shy, and frightened of being married to Joseph.
Do you think maybe God chose Mary /because/ she was afraid of having a child? Because it would mean more for her to say yes to it, than it would for someone for whom it wasn't a big deal.

I thought of when the angel told her not to be frightened. She must have been frightened, or the angel wouldn't have needed to tell her not to be.

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Book Review: Heartless by Anne Elisabeth Stengl

 Heartless (Tales of Goldstone Wood, #1)
I finally sat myself down and read the book Heartless, the first book in the Tales of Goldstone Wood series. 
I had heard some people really didn't like this book, and others loved it, so *southern accent* I was prepared.
 The book is about a princess who wants to fall in love in a fantasy world.  But what happens is at first amusing, then disturbing, then dark and thought-provoking.
It brings about a kind of fairy story I have missed.  The kind that is disturbingly honest and yet has a happy ending that turns my thoughts to heaven. 

This book surprised me.  From reading the first few chapters, it seemed it would be a slow but-interesting-enough book like a Jane Austen novel set in a fantasy world.  But then stuff happened and the story drew me in deeper and it got serious.

The main character, Una, wasn't very likeable, but then neither was Mary Lennox from the Secret Garden or Eustace Clarence Scrubb from the Voyage of the Dawn Treader (except he was amusing) till later in the story.  She was realistic for a character though.
I didn't like Una because she had no idea what love is beyond it being "romantic" and only claimed to be in love because it was dramatic or sounded good.  It's pretty true about some teenagers though.  Sometimes one wonders "is this love?" and wants to call it that because it's "romantic" when really... it's just a small crush.  And then there's that time when it's a crush times a thousand and you really care about that person and it's not just selfish.  And then it's painful.
But anyway, after that, Una sort of was in love... but even then it felt like she was slightly exaggerating it for the sake of it being dramatic and making her life more interesting.   The character Leonard (he's pretty comical) was written so well he seemed so real.  I personally liked Prince Aethelbald and he's more interesting than some Christ figures I have read in other books.

The writing style was sweet and simple and... elegant in a way, for the most part.
A few tiny things could have been a little clearer/written better.
Also, this book was funny.  That was one of the things that kept me reading through the beginning, because I'm not very good at writing comically yet.
Overall it's very good for a debut novel, and holds some worth in provoking thought about trust and other spoiler-y things that I can't talk about.  I will be reading the next books in the series.

Note: this book isn't for everyone.  If you can't stand romance, fantastical dragons, allegory (I wouldn't call the book allegorical myself because it's not like Animal Farm where everything represents something but it does have a Christ figure in it), and characters who act like real people you may meet sometime in your life, you probably won't like this book. 

Have you read it?  What did you think?

Thursday, October 16, 2014

How I Used to Read

 "Better is the end of a thing than the beginning thereof: and the patient in spirit is better than the proud in spirit."~ Ecclesiastes 7:8~


I haven't been posting here in nearly two months, but I have not stopped writing all together.  In fact, I've been writing so much more in my journals since my first Oyan Summer Workshop this June; five pages or more a day on average.  My mind has been very active as of late.
Someone on Facebook asked how other people read, and that sparked a long response from me, so I decided to write a blog post.  Forgive the rambling.

When I was old enough to get in trouble for running, I became interested in the American Girl books.  My mom would read them aloud to me and my older sister (she and I used to share a bedroom and have bunk-beds).  Then there came the first Boxcar Children book.  Whenever my mom or I had a cold, one of us would read aloud our hardback edition to the other one.
Reading out loud is a very special practice to me still.  A few years ago, I read aloud some of Inkheart to my mom whenever she drove me places.
Recently, I've been reading aloud the Tale of Two Cities to my sister, and pausing now and then to reread a section to make sure I understand it.

When I was younger, I was nearly never satisfied with stories because few of them were as exciting as I wanted them to be.  That's why the Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe movie was so special to me when I first saw it in theaters.  I was eight then, and very much desired adventures.

 I came up with my own exciting stories to please my appetite (age 6-10), even though they didn't always make sense when my mom asked me questions about them.  I just really wanted excitement so I made it up for myself and drew pictures of what happened (I am not proud of the pictures, but they were a good enough substitute for words since my handwriting was way too large still).  My first picture book I made when I was five was of a princess captured by pirates and rescued by a hero in a red cape (no he wasn't Superman.  His name started either with an A or a B) and they lived happily ever after.  I gave the little book away to someone for a Christmas present. :P I wish I'd kept it. lol

When I discovered Nancy Drew, I got into the habit of reading ahead in the book.  Actually, I would only check out a Nancy Drew book to find an exciting part and not even read the rest of the book.  I'd get excited, and then the danger would pass and then I would take the book back to the library.  My sister would tell me to stop reading ahead, but it took me a while to do that.  Around the time I read the Atherton series by Patrick Carmen (good science fiction fantasy).

I'll tell you a little story about the Inkworld trilogy in a library near my home where my sister used to be a Shelver.  Once upon a time, I discovered the Inkheart books at the library.  They were the first books I read that had bad language in them, and so it was a weighty decision to read them, but I really wanted to because the movie had enchanted me.  And so I was allowed to read them.

When I got them from the library... I don't know how it came into my head, but it seemed like the logical thing to do: I grabbed a sharpie and blotted out the bad words.  No, you don't need to scold me for "ruining" a library book and making librarians upset.  I didn't think it was wrong at the time.  Well, there was a little voice in the back of my head saying, "You probably will make someone mad."  I felt quite... mischievous and adventurous when I did it, with a grin, kind of like Ellie in Up.
But technically, the books weren't mine.  They belonged to the library.
The funny thing is that the books are about INK and words and books.  Maybe I thought it was appropriate to blot out the d words with ink because of that.
Because words can bite, I told myself.
And the Inkspell (Book two) copy they had was already not in very good condition anyway; it was paperback and the cover was tearing.  And I blotted out the bad words in that one, and in Inkdeath too, till my sister found out and told me to stop.
So I bought my own copies of the books and have been blotting out the words to my heart's content, since I own them now, plus a copy of the first book in German (Tintenherz), which has a lovely cover.  Oh, and the Inkspell copy the library had was sold to a girl for a quarter, so now she doesn't have to read the bad words. lol  And yes, to reassure you, I don't blot out words in library books anymore, though it has been tempting. 

Jane Eyre took a year to read.  I would pick it up and read a few chapters over the course of a week, and then set it aside for a few months, and then pick it back up again.  But I was so proud when I finished it.  Now I feel so young, because reading all these books for the first time suddenly doesn't feel like so long ago.  Life is so short. 

The way I read has changed very much since three years ago when I went to a co-op and discovered symbolism in books.  Before that, I only read a book if it interested me.  I would switch off my own commentary and just read the story as it was, and not think about what I was reading except for how it made me feel.  I didn't pay attention to the theme of the story, the messages, the writing style of the author, the DNA.  But now I have so much to think about when I read, so I don't skim much anymore, unless I'm very bored or must finish the book to take it back to the library.  Now I stop reading now and then to think, "Ooh, that was good dialogue.  Take note."  or "Oh, now that makes sense with the theme of the story." 

How did you read when you were younger?  What are the first books you remember reading?

Thursday, August 28, 2014

11 Influential Works

 Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things.  The things you have learned and received and heard and seen in me, practice these things, and the God of peace will be with you. ~ Philippians 4:8~

 Here are ten books that have stayed with me.  I'd been planning to do this for a long time.  Some of these are books that had a big emotional impact on me when I first got into reading.  They have shaped me in some way or another and made me who I am now.

1.  The Final Storm by Wayne Thomas Batson (last book in the Door Within series) Yes, I know, the writing isn't very good (some say it is choppy and too Christian and could have been better).  But this was the first book that made me set it down and just stare at the wall for a few minutes before reading on, with tears and a big realization.  And it made me very emotional and excited.  It was the first book that had an impact on me.  I read these when I was ten-twelve.  Also these were the first books I'd read that were around 300 pages long.

2.  The Candlestone by Bryan Davis (for the longest time I spelled his first name with an i instead of a y) This and the first book of the Dragons in Our Midst series were my favorites, plus the Eye of the Oracle.  I read it sometime after the Door Within.

3.  Auralia's Colors by Jeffrey Overstreet.  I have said it many times now.  This book (and the ones after it, which added a lot to the experience) made me see how beautiful prose could be.  The moment I started reading chapter two, I was ready to put it on my Christmas list (my family didn't think I could know so early on in the book that I would want to own it but I was ready to), and I did.  I whispered the paragraphs of the second chapter out loud over and over again.  And the story.  The theme!  And then I got to talk to the author through Facebook and learn even more about the meaning of the series.  Other things that made me really happy when I read this book: Auralia didn't want to marry anyone, didn't want to capture anyone's attention.  She wasn't boy crazy.  And I loved that so much.  Jeffrey Overstreet doesn't look down on children and I could really tell that in this series, even though the series was the first book-series I'd read that was  published/marketed for adults.

4.  Cyndere's Midnight by Jeffrey Overstreet. Second book in the Auralia Thread series.  What really stuck with me from this book was the idea that sometimes we can't save everyone, that we only have one heart, one hand.  I understood that more in the past two years.  This book is like a Beauty and the Beast sort of tale, and very good.  Also it has a very pretty cover.

5.  The Wingfeather Saga by Andrew Petersen (though I haven't read the last book yet).  It made me see into the eyes of the older sibling who knows he has to protect the younger ones.  I'm a younger sibling so it was eye-opening seeing things from the older one's POV (even if he happens to be younger than me).  Janner goes through so much and is so loyal to protecting his younger siblings, NO MATTER WHAT.  If he gets beaten up, he doesn't care.  If he dies, he doesn't care because at least he will have done his job.  He's going to be there for his younger brother and shield him as long as he can.  And the theme of monsters and grace. 

6.  A Little Princess by Frances Burnett.  Very strengthening and giving hope.

7.  The Secret Garden by Frances Burnett.  This book was just.. very healthy for my character when I was growing up, and very inspiring, and I probably wouldn't be quite myself if I hadn't ever read the book or watched the movies several times.

8.  Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte.  First classic from the 1800s that I ever read on my own (when I was fourteen-fifteen, I think).  Yes, it did take me a year to get through it.  But it was amazing and I identified with Jane a lot in the beginning half of the book (no, my childhood wasn't terrible at all I just felt her passion for justice).  I'll be buying K. M. Weiland's new annotated edition for writers because it's amazing.

9.  The Book of Names by Dr. Briggs.  It's a fantasy novel that has a distinct flavor and kinda... gave me hope (about the same thing the thing below is about).  Also it reminded my sister and I of our own stories.  But I'm still gonna write mine anyway.

10.  The Silver Chair by C. S. Lewis.  In a time when I was just... maybe going a little crazy because of early teenage years plus the intense desire for stories to never end and the dislike of my own life because it was boring, and fear that I didn't know what was real, my sister quoting Puddleglum's famous line at the end was one of the things that saved me and brought me back to reality.

11.  Peter Pan by J. M. Barrie.  The 2003 movie, more than the book, really made me ask questions about growing up and yes, I actually did cry because I knew that in the Bible Jesus always loved children and said that we should become children, that God reveals mysteries to children, and so I didn't want to grow up...  And it's harder to have faith when you're older.  That was when I made the vow that I would always stay a child at heart, with faith and humility and never look down on children or become cynical like people like Hook.  Also I've always had a lot of actual dreams with Peter Pan in them. :P He's a shadow (NO pun intended) who has led me through childhood.
 
The questions I have had have shaped me, and entered my stories.  The answers to the questions have become really important to me.  So the books that have given me questions and helped me answer them are important to me as well.
If you like, you could write a blog post of eleven works that have influenced you the most.
Or you could tell me some of them in the comments!  (:

Friday, August 8, 2014

Book Thoughts: the Giver

"The Giver" by Louis Lowry
“Write this letter to the angel of the church in Philadelphia.
This is the message from the one who is holy and true,
    the one who has the key of David.
What he opens, no one can close;
    and what he closes, no one can open:
“I know all the things you do, and I have opened a door for you that no one can close. You have little strength, yet you obeyed my word and did not deny me."
~Revelations 3:7-8~
 
I finished reading a book called "The Giver" quite a while ago and decided it was high-time I write another blog post.  I enjoyed the book.  It made me think about various things.  Not as much about political things, though.
 If you do not know what it is about, I will explain a little bit, but it is better to read the book for yourself.  Also, a movie based on the book is coming out pretty soon.

The Giver was written in the 90s, but it surprisingly still applies to today.  Things we now know are wrong with the world... were things that have been around for a long time, before we knew about them.
The story takes place in the future in which we can't see color anymore.  Only black and white.  And we can't make choices anymore.  And there's no snow.  But also, there is no pain anymore.  And no crushes on boys or girls, which also means, I suppose, no lust.  No emotions, and no love.  But.  There is perfection of language, everyone using correct grammar and the right word for things can't be stressed enough in this world.  Everything is clean and organized, and we have reached the height of potential with technology.  It's basically a Utopia, but from the very start, you know something is wrong.
It is a pretty short read, (and it's on youtube on audio book if you want to listen to it) but so full of ideas.  It's one of those books I think everyone should one day read, and discuss with family or friends.

This book made me think about how we overuse the word "love", how every choice we make is important, and how we are responsible for the choices we make. 
Most of the time, when we use the word "love," we really mean, "extremely like".  But that isn't love!  There are many sides to love.  It's mysterious and beautiful.  It's not just caring about someone's well-being.  It's kind and patient and not complaining or prideful... and well, read 1 Corinthians 13.  Even all that doesn't completely describe love, and love isn't the only thing that describes God.  But... I'm going off topic.
  
Children don't normally understand political things when they're young.  That stuff goes over their heads.  They don't normally care about it, because it doesn't affect their immediate happiness much.  We all come from different backgrounds and different reading habits, and different views, of course though. 

There were a few things I didn't agree with that I felt was obvious the author was trying to say through the story, but those were minor things.  And... even if people disagree about a book, that's what makes the book all the better, because it makes us talk about it and think about it.  A book or movie that doesn't offend or challenge or inspire you isn't as worth reading as a book or movie people see differently.

This is the sort of book that shows the power of story, the potential of story through details and themes.  It only mentions a few things in passing, but even just the mentioning of them makes you ask questions, and think.

For example, the removing of colors only made sense (why the government would do that) when the narrator mentioned the color of people's skin.  It made me think about how today's culture is obsessed with equality in every way. 
But we /are/ equal.  Color doesn't change that.  And yet the world ignores this and keeps fighting the air and making a big deal about whether or not someone in a movie/book has dark skin or not. 

I was a bit shocked at the dishonor it was to be an actual birth-mother, in the setting of the story.  Shouldn't they have respect?  The narrator didn't explain. 
And yet the receiver - the one who receives memories of how things used to be - was given the most respect because they... oh.  Because the government didn't want to have to bear pain and the receiver was their way out.  I still don't get it though. 
Then there was the issue of controlled population and sort-of abortion but not, that was present in the book. 
People shouldn't be killed because of fear.  The world was created to thrive under our ownership of it. 
I've realized how often we make decisions that are informed by fear of what may happen.  It may be painful or uncomfortable to go through something.  But a lot of things we don't do because of fear are things we should do anyway.  We are called to be brave.  To create.  To encourage.  To tell the truth.

Then there was the issue of war in the book, and how terrible it was.
And also the question of choices.  Someone always has a choice, even if it's greedy people who are in control.  That's what makes it unfair, because if no one can make the right decision, than the people in control will make mistakes too, no matter how much they try not to.  It's just in our nature.  But still, we can't let robots make decisions for us instead of ourselves.  It's our responsibility to choose for ourselves, different things.  Because we're all unique, and not everyone will understand us.  And because we were given free will by our creator.  Of course, there is a right and wrong, and there will always be a right and wrong.
It is easier to live without having to make choices.  It doesn't require courage and confidence.  It only requires gullibility and blind trust in whoever is making a choice for us.

This book would have made a little more sense if Jonas was 13 instead of 12, but it worked well anyway.  I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone younger than 13, but of course I suppose it depends on one's maturity and not their age.  Age doesn't define how prepared someone is for whatever task is to be given them.
If these questions and/or themes appeal to you, along with science fiction, you may like this book. 

I'm interested to see how they will make the movie, whether it explores those questions better or not as much as the book.

Have you read The Giver?  What do you think of it?  And are you excited about the movie?

Sunday, July 6, 2014

How will you Write your Story?


A story to begin(pinterest)

 “Even in literature and art, no man who bothers about originality will ever be original: whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring twopence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it.” - C.S. Lewis

There are so many questions one will have to ask oneself about his story at some point, and at the beginning, we know almost nothing except a glimmer of an idea.  When you decide you want to make a story, there's all the possibilities of what could happen, but what do you feel when you think of your idea?  Mystery?  Ominous?  And what important theme do you feel so very strongly about that you know will be the heart of the story?  a theme is like a moral or positive character trait proven good by the story.  Or something harder to explain.
The heart is the most important thing.  The carrying out of writing the story will come, but what makes your story emotional? 

Who will do what, and why will they do it?  Character backstories build up the blocks for who they grow up to become.  You'll have to figure out what your story will be.  There are so many pieces, ideas, squares to consider putting in your quilt, threads to consider weaving into your tapestry.
This is the hardest part for me at least, because it always seems to take so long to figure it out, and I'm always worrying my story's not right, that I've missed something, that it doesn't really happen this way.  I'm partially beginning to think that this is something you will have to go through continuously, even when you've almost finished writing a few drafts of the book.  I suppose we shouldn't worry about it so much.  If the Muse interrupts, if the story stops us in the smack dab middle of our work, we must listen to it and do what is best for the overall story.

This whole post is a bunch of questions we should, at some point in writing the story, answer for ourselves.  There's no particular order to answer them in, because you won't know everything at the start, and even if you think you know how it happens, your muse could pop up and say, "Nope.  You've got it wrong.  The character doesn't do that.  They weren't raised that way.  And now your story will have to be completely rewritten again in order for it to make sense."
You won't be able to answer this incomplete, scattered list of questions in one sitting either, unless you've already got your story completely figured out, and even then, you may only think you know your story.  But keep asking them and trying to find their answers, even if you don't have pen and paper handy.  Edgar Allen Poe said "It is this never thinking, unless sitting down to write, which causes so much indifferent composition."

How does your story excite, interest, intrigue you?  Remember, you're writing for yourself.  You're the first reader and if you don't like it, other people might still like it (I know, that was weird, I thought I was going one way with that thought, but then I went the other way).

I've learned over the last year that stories are important because the good ones are about the choices the characters make that reveal what sort of character they are, and how their character is developing.  They aren't stories about things that happen to your characters, but about what your characters do. They're not passive.  Don't let them be.  Everyone's trying to control their own piece of world.  How do they succeed?
How do your characters change over the course of the book?

Once you know what your story is, and can put it solidly in one form and look at it and find no fault in it (after changing it over and over again), like an outline of sorts or writing it as if it were a fairy tale, something else comes up.
This is the question of HOW you will tell this story.  Will you make it a novella, short story, big book, E-book only, series, tv show, movie, manga, anime, cartoon, album of songs with lyrics telling the story, or a bunch of paintings that hint at it?  Or will you just leave it alone, buried within the earth, and pray it never comes up in conversation?
There are so many ways to tell stories now.  We are more equipped than before to tell good stories, and stories are even more available to us than they were ten years ago.
And because there are more books, there is the bigger realization of how many ways there are to present your story.
And if you decide a book is best, how are you going to write it?  What pacing?  Will you sum up what happens here, or will there be no scene breaks, just one very very long scene from birth to death account of someone's life?  What will you tell?  What will you show?  What will you leave out?
Will you write in third person or first?  Past tense or present?  Or will you do what I'm doing now and write in second person, future tense? :P

Where will you begin the story?  The day your main character is born (not that you should do that), or after a bunch of stuff has happened, or what?  What age will your characters be for most of the story, or is your book about a character's whole life?  Are you saying something about growing up?
Is your story about one person or a family or community of people?  Or is it about two: best friends, look-alikes, siblings, or lovers?  Or is it about a few random (but not random) people that a certain event affected each of their lives?
Remember why you are writing this particular story, what its theme is.  If you know its theme, it will help you narrow down how to tell your story.
Tone is very important too.  Is your story aiming to be: light-hearted, contemplative, suspenseful, literary, contemporary, dark, mysterious, funny, adventurous, speculative, or more than one of them?  Which ones?
Most of the time, we do not know the answers to these questions when we begin writing.  We write, groping around a maze, trying to understand.  And there's something beautiful about that, because we are adventurers.
And I should probably follow my own advice.  These questions just sort of popped up in my head so I wanted to ask the world, and myself.  I hope it helps you in some way, and thanks for reading by the way!  It means a lot that people read these.
One thing I love about God is that He knew Esther would be around when her people would need her to do what she did.  We were born for such a time as this.  Be at peace now.
Food for thought.  What do you think?


Sunday, June 22, 2014

Various Writing Observations


“If only it were so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human-being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


In a day, I embark on a wonderful adventure, and shall be away from my computer for five days.  The thing is, it's so very hard to write when you're so excited.  The brain swells and all you can think about is how close it is, and your fingers freeze and refuse to type, and of course your brain controls your fingers... so... I find it is so much easier to write when you have something to start with, and build off of it as if you were editing it, but you're really finishing it. 

There is so much to pray for.  Safety on a journey, a return home, someone sick, a family member dying.  The prayer requests on Facebook never stop coming.  The world keeps turning.  But prayer /is/ powerful.  Don't forget to pray for those you care about, and those you don't like too.  And don't forget to have faith that something good will happen.
In my experience, expecting God to answer a question increases the chance of it getting answered.  But he may not answer you in a way you expect.  He will not always do what you want him to do.  But he knows what we need more than we know what we need.  Also in my experience, the more I trust him, I see his faithfulness and goodness.
Just like a character in a book.  The way out isn't always the easiest.  If our characters knew what we the author put them through, they most likely wouldn't like us.  But God is always with you, ready to comfort you if you allow him.  The world needs more prayer warriors.

I wanted to post a few observations/opinions on writing.  Note: these are simply opinions.  Do not take them for more rules to follow, but possibilities to think about.

When you're learning/hearing/reading about a story someone is writing, don't compare it to something you've watched or read or heard about.  They may think it means their story isn't original enough.  But the truth is there is nothing that's original, only our individual voice/character/style of writing, and our approaches to writing.

When writing a character, there should be something unique about their look that draws the reader in.  In one of my stories this meant black-and-white-striped stockings, jeans that only went down to the knee with a few tears in them, and an old, purple backpack that my character Melody wore.  In the movie an American Tale, it was sleeves much too long for the little mouse, that sometimes get in the way.  In the Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (movie), it was Lucy's chin-length hair that made her unique.  In the book of course, she had pig-tails in the illustrations, but I don't think C. S. Lewis ever really described his characters much, unless they were unordinary like a talking mouse or Prince Caspian.  He left much up to the reader to imagine, though this was hard because we had already seen the illustrations that showed the characters. hm.

Don't tell us too often what a character /didn't/ do, because it will make us think about the action they aren't doing, and sometimes we don't notice the "didn't" in front of it.  Only tell us what the characters /do/.  This is only opinion though.  Perhaps it's okay to do.  Maybe it's just a way to be more concise.  Sometimes it is important to focus on what a character isn't doing.

And don't forget the villain's humane side.  Nothing ever started out being evil, though bad habits form bad character from the very beginning if they're not pruned like branches of a tree.  My own villain has a conscience buried deep inside him, though he hates it and longs to be rid of it.  He easily overpowers it because he's fought against it for so long.  And because of this, he feels somehow more real/scary than say... Captain Hook in the book or Disney movie, Peter Pan (he's not scary at all... well... not very... and not for long... in Once upon a Time).  Or even... say... Maleficent in Disney's Sleeping Beauty.

The movie, "Maleficent", is a different matter. *spoiler alert* Their version was merely a woman who had been wronged and so we understand why she places a curse on a kingdom whose king is greedy and evil (he's kind of more evil than she is though).  And then she regrets it and tries to even stop it.  I wouldn't call her a villain.  A villain is someone who stands in opposition of the hero. *spoiler over*  Not that Maleficent is a bad movie.  I still want to see it.  (yeah... I'm spoiled by reading way too many movie reviews)

Into the Woods (a musical) is a good example of how even the people we think are the heroes and heroines of stories do bad things, and how those things have consequences.  And they /still/ don't have a trailer for the movie yet.  Maybe they'll get a trailer for it while I'm gone.  I do know Disney is changing it a bit to make it less sad (and I'm kind of sad about that :P ) but they're not /ruining/ it... hopefully.
What do you think of all this?